Sixty-two city employees will receive layoff notices next week after council reaffirmed Monday its decision to close municipally operated daycare centres.
The layoff, one of the biggest in the City of Windsor's history, takes effect in September when all nine municipally operated child care centres in the city and county are closed. Council reaffirmed the controversial decision it had made in February during a 21/2 hour debate Monday night.
"This is going to be extremely difficult," said Jean Fox, president of CUPE Local 543 which represents the 118 employees directly affected by the closure decision.
CAO Helga Reidel said the 62 layoff notices cover regular, full-time early child care education workers. The rest are part-time and temporary workers, a number of whom have already posted for existing vacancies within the city bureaucracy, said Reidel.
Because of seniority rights under the CUPE collective agreement, the layoff notices going out next week are expected to have a "cascading effect" as senior employees bump more junior workers, with that triggering more bumpings elsewhere, a process Mayor Eddie Francis said could take from two to four years.
"The bumping process will be very difficult," said Reidel. The shuffling around will require retraining to make former child care workers eligible to fill in as other openings become available across the city workforce.
"I would not call this situation chaotic," Reidel said.
She estimated that between 20 and 30 of those getting layoff notices next week have enough seniority to be guaranteed employment with the city.
The municipality has already hired two "employee relations assistants" to help in the process, and Reidel said discussions are underway with the school boards and private sector child care operators to accommodate those city employees who wish to continue working with children. One of the factors in city council's decision was the province's decision to begin offering full-day JK and SK at schools starting this fall.
Parents, city ECE workers and public child care advocates spoke out again Monday night and were hoping to get council to reconsider, but after hearing from officials for the private and non-profit daycare sectors, and after receiving new information from administration, councillors reconfirmed their earlier decision.
City clerk Valerie Critchley advised council that only a reconsideration motion would suffice to change council's position taken in February, requiring a motion by one of the councillors who had earlier voted in favour and then a two-thirds vote. But councillor after councillor spoke out in favour of the closures, and even Coun. Alan Halberstadt joined in by now saying it was the appropriate decision.
Halberstadt, arguing the closures should be phased in, had previously sided with councillors Percy Hatfield and Ken Lewenza Jr. in voting against Windsor leaving the daycare business. But administration said operating fewer centres would make the system even more expensive to operate per child.
The vote in February passed 5-3 with Francis joining councillors Dave Brister, Jo-Anne Gignac, Fulvio Valentinis and Drew Dilkens in favour. As with the earlier debate, councillors Ron Jones and Bill Marra declared conflicts of interest, while Caroline Postma, who also refrained from the earlier discussion and vote, was at a conference and absent Monday.
A staff report earlier this year claimed the city and county would save about $1 million from the closures, and that the private sector could pick up the slack and at half the cost per child care position.
Parent Shannon Porcellini, a separate school board trustee and city council candidate in this year's election, questioned why the city was willing to "spend my tax dollars" on building a factory for a solar energy company but not on daycares which employ 118 people.
ECE work
Study: high quality childcare can yield long-term academic benefits – Wellness – TIME.com
These latest findings from the Early Child Care Research Network — a federally funded research project into American childcare that was launched in 1991 — expand on those from an earlier study that examined the impact of childcare quality on 4½-year-olds about to enter kindergarten. As lead author Deborah Lowe Vandell, chairwoman of the department of education at the UC Irvine told the Journal:
"The effects didn't fade away… Lots of things change after [age] four and a half. We would have expected [the effects] went away."
The early benefit seen by age 4½ seems to persist through adolescence, the researchers found. Yet, in addition to tracking long-term academic benefits of high-quality care, the study also revealed that children who spent time in childcare were more slightly likely to engage in impulsive or risky behavior than those who did not attend childcare outside of the home. As the Los Angeles Times explains:
"In terms of risk-taking, the link to time spent in day care was more marginal: Ten more hours a week in day care prompted the average teen to answer one out of 30 questions with an admission of more risky behavior."
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 183
- 184
- 185
- 186
- 187
- …
- 507
- Next Page »